Decision Signal
Proceed with confidence
Population Response
Decision Tested
Disclose security breach proactively with full transparency versus minimal legally-required disclosure
Population Simulated
Buyers & Users
1000
synthetic personas
Scenario
Customers receive breach notification with detailed timeline, impact assessment, and remediation steps
Representative Voices
"This is how you handle a breach. Transparent, detailed, and actionable."
"I'm upset about the breach but impressed by the response. I'll stay."
"Our security team needs to review this. We may need to reassess the relationship."
"Rare to see this level of transparency. Will cover positively."
"The disclosure is thorough, but I need to understand our contractual obligations."
"Appreciated the plain-language explanation. Now I know exactly what to do."
Leverage Points
What improves judgment
- 1Lead with what customers should do, then explain what happened
- 2Provide 1-year free credit monitoring for affected users
- 3Publish detailed technical post-mortem for security community
- 4Offer direct line to security team for enterprise customers
Unresolved Risks
What remains uncertain
- Some enterprise contracts may have automatic termination clauses
- Competitors will use breach in sales conversations
- Second disclosure (if new information emerges) will damage credibility
- Legal exposure if disclosure timing is questioned later