Decision Signal
Address identified issues first
Population Response
Decision Tested
Deprecate legacy product and require all customers to migrate to new platform within 12 months
Population Simulated
Buyers & Users
600
synthetic personas
Overweighted: Long-tenure enterprise customers
Scenario
Customers receive migration timeline with feature comparison and migration support offer
Representative Voices
"We have 8 years of workflows built on this. 12 months is not enough time."
"The new platform is objectively better. Happy to have a forcing function to migrate."
"Which features aren't migrating? Our compliance team needs a detailed gap analysis."
"We've budgeted for other projects this year. This throws off our entire roadmap."
"Finally. The legacy system has been holding us back for years."
"This is the third forced migration in 5 years. We're evaluating alternatives."
Leverage Points
What improves judgment
- 1Extend timeline to 18-24 months for enterprise customers with complex implementations
- 2Provide detailed feature parity roadmap with committed delivery dates
- 3Offer dedicated migration project management for top-tier customers
- 4Create legacy feature preservation mode for critical workflows
Unresolved Risks
What remains uncertain
- Enterprise customers may use migration as opportunity to evaluate competitors
- Missing features may be more critical than internal teams realize
- Migration failures will generate disproportionate support burden
- Contract renewal timing may create cliff of simultaneous migrations